We are, i’m afraid, confronted to an increasing lack of fine-tuned ideas and their understanding. That’s all what I meant to say : interpreting one’s words is a trending behavior, maybe because of modern life’s speed leading to speedy understanding in a speedy world. Lastly, Big Ears are very much the fact of the Western world and are not really what you could call deployed by private companies… The worst in this opposition is to consider that trusting a country which logs users’ data is not compatible with trust, but I perceive no legitimate digression leading to communism and democracy : after all data logging is not specific to Russia and the only difference would be that spying on users in the Western world is led by private companies when it is or may be led by governments elsewhere. We may very well as trust “Russia and China” and nevertheless agree with Commenter’s statement that “Russian operators and websites are required to keep your data, check out the Yarovaya law.” : one one hand a sentiment (trust) and on the other a fact (data logging). What I meant when answering on his/her answer on Commenter’s comment was that, IMO, there was nothing which explicitly nor even implicitly raised a political argument. Interpreting a comment is the source of many clashes, misunderstanding or deducting what is not explicit. Obvious, right?! Well, you’ll always have minds to believe that what seems obvious must hide a ruse =) To make it slightly confusing we can spice it with “Poetry and astronomical digressions apart, what’s the only day where we can say that yesterday was last year”. Vaak, what’s the only day where we can say that yesterday was last year? Ask it to an audience and see who answers first.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |